Shropshire Council

County smallholding estate

  • Period: 03 May 2016 - 31 May 2016
  • Status: Closed
  • Audiences: Farmers and landowners
  • Topics: Asset management
  • Type: Public

Background

The Council own an Agricultural estate of 410 hectares (863.24 acres).  The properties comprise of 18 holdings of between 4.31 acres and 78.87 acres (the "Estate").

The current policy (the "Policy") which relates to the Estate was principally set in 2005 when the former Shropshire County Council, (as a forerunner authority to Shropshire Council) took a decision to retain the remaining small holding estate, but allow the individual small holdings to be sold as they became vacant or were sold to the existing tenants on request.  There were minor amendments to the Policy in December 2014 to allow for tenants to surrender their tenancies and in February 2016 to allow for direct descendants to tenants to acquire the holdings.

Given the present pressures on Public Sector funding and spending, Shropshire Council is having to review all activities undertaken by the Council in order to prioritise its expenditure.  There is less funding available to Shropshire Council than in previous years and it needs to ensure that the funds are used in a way that has the most positive impact for our community.  Current projections suggest that no funding at all will be made by Central Government to Local Government by 2020.

Since our last consultation and subsequent Policy amendment, rents of the Farm Estate have been reviewed. Rents are linked to the earnings potential of each holding.  Against modern standards the sizes of the holdings are small, there is therefore no further scope to offset costs of repairs and maintenance which exceed income from rents.  The fact that the holdings are too small to carry out even subsistence farming, has resulted in the council’s preferred action being a disposal of the remaining Estate. The Council is now seeking views on this proposed Policy change in this Consultation.

In formulating the Consultation and proposed Policy change the Council has had regard to Part III, Agricultural Act 1970 which states that a council:

Shall make it their general aim to offer opportunities for persons to be farmers on their own account.

It has also considered the view of DEFRA which (as MAFF) in 1999 wrote:

Advice from the Ministry’s Legal Department to officials and to Ministers has been clear over many years: Section 39 does not impose the specific duty that smallholdings must be maintained at a particular level. Neither the policy nor object of Part III of the Act was to do so.

The express duty imposed by section 47(I) of the Agricultural Act 1947 on Local Authorities to provide statutory smallholdings was repealed by the 1970 Act and replaced by the general aim provision.

The aim of this Consultation is to gather opinion on the options available to the Council with respect to the Estate.  The Council will consider the responses to the consultation and take the outcome of the consultation into account before making a final decision.  Following the consultation, we will prepare a paper to be presented to the Council with a recommendation on the future direction of the Estate.

This consultation sets out a number of options available.  The options have been drawn up after much deliberation.  Below we have sought to outline the options we are considering and identify the key advantages, disadvantages and potential impact of each option.  However, the Council remains open-minded as to the benefits and / or disadvantages of the Options available and you may be able to identify other factors which we have not identified below, and we would therefore welcome your views on what those additional factors are.

At the end of the consultation the paper will be considered at a cabinet meeting on 6 July 2016 and a council meeting on the 21 July 2016.

Options for the future of the Estate

Option 1: Dispose of the Estate on the open market

Option 1 the council’s preferred option, would be to sell the Estate on the open market to the highest bidder as a whole or in lots.

Advantages

  • Option 1 is likely to generate the highest amount of capital for the Council.
  • The purchaser(s) could go further than the Council has been able to in recent times, due to reductions in funding, to address business critical maintenance of the Estate.
  • The tenants will have a level of protection under their tenancy agreements.

Disadvantages

  • As the sale of the Estate under Option 1 will be to the highest bidder the Council is likely to have only limited control over who the Estate is sold to.
  • A commercial landlord is likely to have a different focus for the Estate.  This could, for example, result in more or less investment into the Estate and more or less support for Tenants.
  • Any new landlord may impose changes to the lease arrangements which are not in the best interests of agricultural farming.
  • Option 1 provides no guarantee the stock will be safeguarded for the future.
  • The current tenants may not be able to acquire the small holdings giving security of ownership for them and their families if they wish to continue farming in the future.

Impact of Option 1

  • Tenants will have a new landlord and whilst their tenancies provide a level of protection the Council will have no control over the estate in the future and has no means of guaranteeing the future of the farming estate.

Option 2: Sell the Estate to an organisation who wishes to maintain the Estate and secure access to farming for the future

Option 2 would be to dispose of the Estate to an organisation who wishes to maintain the Estate and wishes to secure access to farming for future generations.

Advantages

  • A potential to transfer the estate to an organisation which would not only maintain the existing Council philosophy of smallholdings but could build on this principle and extend into the original concept of encouraging young people into farming would be an advantage. 
  • An organisation could go further than the Council has been able in recent times, due to reductions in funding, to address business critical maintenance and provide more support to existing tenants to safeguard their own future and that of the holding.  
  • With the absence of the funding restrictions faced by the Council, an organisation would be able to go further than the Council has been able to in recent times to address business critical maintenance;
  • The tenants will have a level of protection under their tenancy agreements.
  • The organisation would be able to provide more support to existing tenants to safeguard their own future and that of the holding.
  • The potential transfer could create opportunities for the future which could be delivered more effectively by another organisation.

Disadvantages

  • The current tenants will not be able to acquire the small holdings giving security of ownership for them and their families.

Impact of Option 2

  • The future of farming in the county will be secured if additional land could be acquired to increase the size of each holding, the tenant’s position will remain the same as the council has the ability to agree the terms of the agreement with a preferred landlord based on the consultation feedback.

Councils view on the above options

Whilst the Council has not yet made a decision, of the available options, Option 1 is currently the Councils preferred option.  However, we are still at the stage of considering all options with an open mind and are keen to hear your views on this. 

Next steps

We would welcome your views on the above options. 

Click on the 'Get involved' tab at the top of the page to share your views on the local offer.

To comment on the proposed options, please click on the green button below to access a short online feedback form.

Go to the form »

 

Data protection

Information collected in our surveys will only be used by us (Shropshire Council) to inform the immediate and future provision of our services. The information you provide will be kept confidential in accordance with our Privacy Policy. It will not be shared outside of Shropshire Council. Information collected via our online surveys (hosted on the Surveymonkey website) will be stored on SurveyMonkey’s servers in the United States of America and SurveyMonkey gives an undertaking never to disclose the survey questions or your responses to others without permission.